Integrating Sentinel-1 SAR and Sentinel-2 optical imagery with a crop structure dynamics model to track crop condition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellites are delivering data at the spatial resolutions and geographies needed for operational crop monitoring. Of particular interest, Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data in Single Look Complex (SLC) format can be processed to provide polarimetric parameters sensitive to crop development. This study created a Sentinel-1 based SAR vegetation index for canola, calibrated to Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) (SARcal-NDVI) values calculated from Sentinel-2. A Random Forest Regressor (RFR) modelled the SARcal-NDVI, from four selected polarimetric features (degree of linear polarization (DoLP), normalized Shannon entropy (SE), the second eigenvalue of the coherency matrix (l2) and the ellipticity angle (χ)). The coefficient of determination (R2) between the Sentinel-2 NDVI and the SARcal-NDVI was 0.89. RFR-generated SARcal-NDVI estimates, based on the four SLC generated polarimetric parameters, were then used with a Canopy Structure Dynamics Model (CSDM) and with Growing Degree Days (GDD) to estimate the condition of canola at a daily time step. The SARcal--NDVI time series estimated from the CSDM model was correlated to the ground measured biomass. During the rapid accumulation of biomass from early to mid-season, correlations of the SARcal-NDVI to wet biomass were strong (R2 of 0.88). Correlations were still significant albeit weaker during pod development and throughout the period of canola senescence (R2 of 0.42). As climate variability drives uncertainty in the agricultural sector, sensors like the Sentinels can be leveraged to track changes in crop acreages and crop productivity. The next step in this research is to extend to other economically important crops such as corn, soybeans and wheat and test the ability of a Sentinel-1-based vegetation index to inform crop yield estimates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".