Défendre sa/ses langues : quels mots pour le dire ? Le cas de l’amazigh au Maroc
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Le traitement des langues au Maroc est fortement associé aux aspects politiques, idéologiques, \néducatifs, identitaires que l’on peut observer dans un pays marqué par une dynamique sociale assez \nsoutenue. La valorisation d’une langue ou sa minoration va de pair avec l’attitude qui prévaut à \nl’égard des langues de la communication quotidienne et de la culture populaire dans ses versants \narabophone et amazighophone. Le fossé n’a pas cessé de se creuser depuis très longtemps, entre \nune culture savante, élitiste, dominante et une culture dite "de masse", reléguée au second plan, \ndépréciée. La distribution des biens culturels et linguistiques participe d’un rapport de force régi \npar des considérations que les différents antagonistes rattachent à différentes sphères : identitaire, \nculturelle, économique, religieuse, etc. [...]"
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it