Relation culture, communication et participation en contexte éducatif pluriel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur la relation entre la culture et la communication ainsi que ses incidences sur les divers modes de participation en contexte éducatif pluriel où les apprenants proviennent de différents espaces culturels et linguistiques. Après avoir présenté le contexte de notre recherche, nous exposerons des éléments théoriques relatifs à l’interrelation étroite entre le concept de culture et notre façon de communiquer, en tant qu’enseignants, afin de mieux comprendre ses répercussions sur la participation des apprenants de langue. Ensuite, nous présenterons des cas d’asynchronisme réels observés en lien avec les modes de participation des apprenants ainsi que les interventions pédagogiques s’y rapportant. Enfin, les résultats issus de notre recherche permettront de proposer des pistes d’intervention visant à une participation équilibrée de divers acteurs en contexte pluriel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".