MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312497971 · doi:10.7202/1092721ar

Gregory, M. R. et Laverty, M. J. (dir.). (2021). In Community of Inquiry with Ann Margaret Sharp. Childhood, philosophy and education. Routledge

2021· article· en· W4312497971 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Gabrielle Léonard-Benoit

Bibliographic record

VenueNouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy for ChildrenHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gregory, M. R. et Laverty, M. J. (dir.). (2021). In Community of Inquiry with Ann Margaret Sharp. Childhood, philosophy and education. Routledge. Un article de la revue Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation (Care et philosophie pour enfants : au-delà du caring thinking, un projet éthique et politique) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.013
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0110.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducationSame topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207