Résistance et aveu dans Les fous de Bassan d’Anne Hébert : le chemin vers la révolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’écriture implique invariablement le désir de dire, sans pour autant aboutir à un aveu. Mais, lorsque cet aveu constitue la source ou l’obsession de l’écriture, l’acte de dire ou de taire transcende le texte, matérialisant ainsi l’aveu lui-même. Cet article s’intéresse à ce geste de révélation scripturale dans Les fous de Bassan d’Anne Hébert, où il est motivé par un sentiment de responsabilité né du double assassinat des cousines Atkins et partagé entre les membres de leur communauté, celle de Griffin Creek, lieu imaginaire situé sur la côte de la Gaspésie. À partir des idées avancées par Michel Foucault dans l’Histoire de la sexualité et d’une exploration de l’Apocalypse de Jean, nous verrons comment, dans le roman, la force de l’aveu participe efficacement à la lutte féministe, si chère à l’écrivaine québécoise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.028 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".