VÍNCULO MÃE-FILHO E OPORTUNIDADES PARA O DESENVOLVIMENTO MOTOR DE LACTENTES EXPOSTOS E NÃO EXPOSTOS AO HIV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivos: Caracterizar e avaliar o vínculo mãe-filho, as oportunidades domiciliares e o desenvolvimento motor de lactentes expostos e não expostos ao HIV entre 4 a 12 meses de idade. Métodos: Estudo transversal com 48 lactentes e suas mães, sendo 21 expostos ao HIV e 27 não expostos. As mães responderam ao Protocolo de Avaliação do Vínculo Mãe-Filho, o questionário Affordances no Ambiente Domiciliar, o desenvolvimento motor foi avaliado pela Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Aplicou-se a correlação de Pearson, e nível de significância p-valor <0,05. Resultados: A correlação entre vínculo mãe-filho e grupo é positiva (r=0,330; p=0,022). Os lactentes expostos ao HIV apresentaram menor vínculo mãe-filho (p=0,006). Conclusão: Houve relação entre menor vínculo mãe-filho entre os lactentes expostos ao HIV, mas não houve diferenças em relação ao desenvolvimento motor e as oportunidades domiciliares.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".