Fair Multi-Resource Allocation in Heterogeneous Servers With an External Resource Type
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper considers the problem of fair allocation of multiple types of resources in heterogeneous servers, along with a resource type external to those servers. Our work is motivated by the need for fair multi-resource allocation in mobile edge computing (MEC), where the users must upload their tasks over a single dedicated wireless communication link that exists outside the computing servers. We propose a fair multi-resource allocation mechanism for this environment, termed Task Share Fairness with External Resource (TSF-ER), which finds the Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solution satisfying important fairness properties. We show that TSF-ER is envy-free, Pareto optimal, and strategy-proof, and it satisfies the property of sharing incentive. Large-scale simulation driven by Google and Alibaba cluster trace further shows that TSF-ER significantly outperforms the existing utilitarian, Nash social welfare maximizer, and egalitarian solutions, leading to fairer resource allocation while maintaining a high level of resource utilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it