Bibliographic record
Abstract
Visual grounding (VG) aims to align the correct regions of an image with a natural language query about that image. We found that existing VG methods are trapped by the single-stage grounding process that performs a sole evaluate-and-rank for meticulously prepared regions. Their performance depends on the density and quality of the candidate regions, and is capped by the inability to optimize the located regions continuously. To address these issues, we propose to remodel VG into a progressively optimized visual semantic alignment process. Our proposed multi-modal dynamic graph transformer (M-DGT) achieves this by building upon the dynamic graph structure with regions as nodes and their semantic relations as edges. Starting from a few randomly initialized regions, M-DGT is able to make sustainable adjustments (i.e., 2D spatial transformation and deletion) to the nodes and edges of the graph based on multi-modal information and the graph feature, thereby efficiently shrinking the graph to approach the ground truth regions. Experiments show that with an average of 48 boxes as initialization, the performance of M-DGT on the Flickr30k Entities and RefCOCO datasets outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods by a substantial margin, in terms of both accuracy and Intersect over Union (IOU) scores. Furthermore, introducing M-DGT to optimize the predicted regions of existing methods can further significantly improve their performance. The source codes are available at https://github.com/iQua/M-DGT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".