MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312526795 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3229676

Blockchain-Assisted Secure Intra/Inter-Domain Authorization and Authentication for Internet of Things

2022· article· en· W4312526795 on OpenAlexaff
Fei Tong, Xing Chen, Cheng Huang, Yujian Zhang, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersSoutheast UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer securityAccess controlAuthentication (law)BlockchainSmart contractInteroperabilitySecurity analysisAnonymityAuthentication protocolComputer networkMutual authenticationWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multidomain Internet of Things (IoT) is faced with serious domain interoperability (DI) and compatibility issues since different intradomain authorization and authentication (A&A) mechanisms are deployed without the consideration of interdomain A&A. This article proposes a blockchain-assisted scheme to achieve flexible intra- and inter-domain A&A simultaneously and seamlessly. Specifically, we first design a contract-based mutual access control agreement on top of a consortium blockchain, where domain managers can manage their access permission without any trusted parties. Based on the agreement, a secure and privacy-preserving authentication protocol is further proposed by tailoring one-out-of-many proof techniques, which enables IoT devices to anonymously access authorized IoT domains. We additionally design a voting-based protocol by using a threshold-based cryptosystem. The protocol allows domain managers to transparently audit resource access with the assistance of the blockchain. Detailed security analysis demonstrates that the proposed scheme achieves the security properties, such as DI, privacy protection, and accountability. Finally, we develop two proof-of-concept prototypes in a physical testbed and virtual machine, respectively, based on an open-source blockchain platform to show our scheme’s efficiency in terms of computation and communication overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFrench-language works237,207