MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312537296 · doi:10.1017/9781800104198.005

Identities: Sierra Leone and the Gambia

2021· other· en· W4312537296 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSierra leoneGeographyGender studiesEthnologyGenealogySociologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The British tried but failed to construct martial races in Sierra Leone and the Gambia. While robust and well-known martial identities and reputations emerged in colonial Nigeria and the Gold Coast, British officers in the two smaller West African territories struggled to find communities on which to impose similar designations. Despite a history of intense precolonial war-fare in the area, and after many colonial experiments and changing opinions about military recruiting, British authorities labeled all Sierra Leonean and Gambian men as lacking the inherent qualities needed to make good soldiers. At the same time, the need for military personnel to provide internal security in these territories and to fight wars in other places meant that the British still recruited many Sierra Leoneans and Gambians into the colonial army. During the Second World War, British officers in Sierra Leone and the Gambia admitted that colonial martial race theory represented a fantasy. Before colonial conquest, powerful military identities existed within the societies of both Sierra Leone and the Gambia. During the nineteenth century, Sierra Leone and the Gambia, where the British had already established the respective coastal enclaves of Freetown and Bathurst (Banjul), experienced intensive warfare. Central to the fighting of these wars were growing mercenary bands composed of armed young men, popularly called “war boys,” from various ethnic groups who wore magical amulets believed to protect them from bullets and received a share of loot from their cam-paigns. War boys fought with guns and swords, specialized in ambushes and raiding in the bush environment, and built defended stockades. In Sierra Leone, local powers fought a series of “trade wars” over control of commerce with the coast and in the Gambia, traditionalist communities and Jihadist Muslims waged war on each other. In the 1890s, during the so-called Scramble for Africa, the British pushed into the hinterland of both territories in a race with the French to secure the region. In Sierra Leone, in 1890, the British created the locally recruited Frontier Police that gradually extended colonial authority over the interior with the proclamation of a protectorate in 1896. However, in 1898, a widespread rebellion by both Mende and Temne peoples, the largest ethnic groups in the territory, against British rule broke out in Sierra Leone given oppression by the Frontier Police, abolition of the local slave trade, erosion of chiefly power, and in particular the imposition of colonial taxation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAfrican history and culture studies→French-language works237,207→