Combined Effect of Pressure, Temperature and Soil Stiffness on Pipeline Strain Demand in Geohazard Zones
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Pipelines subject to ground deformations produced by geohazard loads carry high importance on pipeline analysis, design, and assessment due to risk of structural failure. An appropriate approach for evaluation is the finite element method (FEM), providing efficient and sophisticated results. Methods proposed by Zheng et al. (2021) using finite element analysis (FEA) software Abaqus/Standard provide highly accurate results by simulating a displacement-controlled analysis of buried steel pipes subject to ground displacement of varying magnitudes and direction. This paper aims to further develop this pipe strain demand assessment by including variable effects of internal pressure and temperature of steel pipes buried in soils of different stiffness. The developed strain demand criterion considers inelastic material behaviour for different grades of steel pipe, as well as bi-linear soil force-displacement interaction, accounting for soil plasticity (ALA, 2001). Assuming the effects of thermal expansion are negligible prior to ground motion initiation, the pipe loads can be assessed by modelling a pipeline with initial temperature and pressure loads, followed by a ground motion in a series of steps. Several case studies were performed by modelling an X65 grade pipeline subject to ground displacements varying from 100 to 1000 mm, across a length at the midsection of the pipe. Simulations are assessed with a specified temperature increase, and internal pressure required to induce an operating hoop stress of up to 80% of the specified minimum yield strength (SMYS). By assessing the pipeline in soils of different stiffness (low, intermediate, high) at different increments of ground displacement, an accurate representation of the material stress/strain response can be acquired for each respective case. This research may provide guidance for further studies of pipelines involving internal pressure & temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it