Bibliographic record
Abstract
Incremental learning aims to learn new classes if they emerge while maintaining the performance for previously known classes. It acquires useful information from incoming data to update the existing models. Open-set recognition, however, requires the ability to recognize examples from known classes and reject examples from new/unknown classes. There are two main challenges in this matter. First, new class discovery: the algorithm needs to not only recognize known classes but it must also detect unknown classes. Second, model extension: after the new classes are identified, the model needs to be updated. Focusing on this matter, we introduce incremental open-set multiclass support vector machine algorithms that can classify examples from seen/unseen classes, using incremental learning to increase the current model with new classes without entirely retraining the system. Comprehensive evaluations are carried out on both open set recognition and incremental learning. For open-set recognition, we adopt the openness test that examines the effectiveness of a varying number of known/unknown labels. For incremental learning, we adapt the model to detect a single novel class in each incremental phase and update the model with unknown classes. Experimental results show promising performance for the proposed methods, compared with some representative previous methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".