MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312559179 · doi:10.12797/9788381387200

Pracujemy dla Polski : listy Władysława Platera do Józefa Ignacego Kraszewskiego z lat 1863-1887

2022· book· en· W4312559179 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zdzisław Pietrzyk

Bibliographic record

VenueKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishing eBooks · 2022
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Cultural Studies of Poland
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolishQuarter (Canadian coin)Section (typography)ArtHistoryAncient historyClassicsArchaeologyPhilosophyComputer scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The correspondence of Józef Ignacy Kraszewski kept in the Manuscript Section of the Jagiellonian Library constitutes an indispensable source for the history of Polish culture in the second half of the 19th century. The collection of Władysław Plater’s letters is remarkable among hundreds of Kraszewski’s correspondents. These letters were written in the years 1863-1887, so they include relations from almost a quarter of the century of activities characterising the founder of the Polish National Museum in Rapperswil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishing eBooksSame topicHistorical and Cultural Studies of PolandFrench-language works237,207