Justiciabilité et droit international privé québécois : les statuts matrimoniaux libanais
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis l’arrêt de la Cour suprême du Canada, Bruker c. Marcovitz, des clauses matrimoniales peuvent traduire des obligations normatives religieuses ou culturelles en obligations valides et exécutoires en mobilisant la doctrine ou notion de justiciabilité. Cette notion, qui repose sur des règles, des normes, ainsi que des principes jurisprudentiels, permet de délimiter le champ d’application de l’intervention judiciaire dans la vie socio-culturelle. Il est ici soutenu qu’elle mérite d’être examinée en droit international privé québécois, car l’articulation entre la justiciabilité et l’extranéité normative permettrait la prise en compte d’une norme étrangère lors de litiges familiaux entre des parties d’origine immigrée. Cette hypothèse est appliquée dans l’analyse du traitement par les tribunaux québécois de litiges matrimoniaux entre immigrants libanais de différentes confessions minoritaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".