MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312567521 · doi:10.1504/ijmr.2022.127090

Computational modelling of SLM additive manufacturing of metals

2022· article· en· W4312567521 on OpenAlex
Shubham Chaudhry, J.W. Tcheumanak Chuitcheu I.V. Tchouambe, Azzeddine Soulaïmani, Rajeev Das

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Manufacturing Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelective laser meltingPrismMaterials scienceResidual stressFusionMetal powderThermalResidualCalibrationCompression (physics)Computer simulationLayer (electronics)Process (computing)Mechanical engineeringComposite materialComputer scienceMetallurgyAlgorithmMetalEngineeringOpticsMicrostructureMathematicsSimulationThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a technology that can create 3D structures by depositing or melting material in a layer-by-layer manner. This paper focuses on the metal-based powder bed fusion AM approach, specifically the selective laser melting (SLM) technique. The repetitive hot and cold cycles associated with AM, causes localised compression and tension giving rise to significant residual stresses, which can lead to shape loss, structural failure, etc. Numerous parameters determine the thermal gradient; these include the thermal characteristics of the powder, the bed temperature, and the part size. This investigation describes the associated problem formulation and numerical resolution in the SLM simulation. An ANSYS-additive model is developed to determine the parameter dependence on the process. An efficient parameter calibration algorithm is proposed to generate an accurate numerical model. Three numerical studies are conducted using a vertical prism, a horizontal prism, and an L-shaped structure also compared with the experimental data. [Submitted 25 July 2020; Accepted 10 December 2020]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it