MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bibliografía

2022· article· es· W4312580619 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAraucaria · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill UniversityUniversity of OxfordUniversity of ChicagoHarvard UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of CambridgeYale University
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Correspondence of Edward Gibbon en 26 volmenes, al cuidado de David Womersley, que est llamada a ser la edicin de referencia en el futuro y que incorporar la edicin crtica de Decline and Fall que el profesor Womersley ya ha publicado y consignamos abajo. Hasta que esa edicin vea la luz, resumimos, en orden cronolgico, la bibliografa actualizada en tres apartados: 1) ediciones generales (de Decline and Fall solo la edicin de Womersley), 2) literatura de referencia y 3) traducciones al espaol. Buena parte de las entradas se encuentra disponible en internet y es de fcil acceso.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it