MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312581875 · doi:10.34260/jaebs.613

Cost of Nutritious Diet for Children in Pakistan and Effects of Imminent Afghan Refugees on Existing Consumption Pattern

2022· article· en· W4312581875 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rahema Obaid, Tehseen Ahmed, Stephen Davies, Abdul Wajid Rana

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Economics and Business Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeePer capitaConsumption (sociology)Environmental healthAfghanQuarter (Canadian coin)SocioeconomicsAgricultural economicsEconomicsGeographyDemographic economicsDemographyBusinessMedicinePopulationPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fall of Kabul after the US withdrawal from Afghanistan may have serious repercussions for Pakistan if the influx of refugees accelerates, as additional demand for food items and resulting inflationary pressures can jeopardize the diets of children. To examine this issue, we estimate the gap between actual and desired per capita expenditures on a least cost nutritious diet consumed by Pakistani children aged 3-10 years. The study finds the gap across income groups and regions for two provinces of Pakistan i.e., KP and Balochistan. We find that under-consumption is highest in children of Balochistan Urban and KP Urban, as households in both locations spend only 21 percent of the recommended dietary expenditures. We estimate the decrease in dietary expenditures coming from an increase in food prices after the refugees’ influx. We found the dietary gap is high if the influx of refugees exceeds one million by the first quarter of 2022. However, the dietary gap does not increase much if the number of refugee arrival remains under 700,000, albeit the large nutrition gap does not improve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Economics and Business Studies→Same topicChild Nutrition and Water Access→French-language works237,207→