MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312583706 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2022.3224765

Online Distributed Optimization for Energy-Efficient Computation Offloading in Air-Ground Integrated Networks

2022· article· en· W4312583706 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Beijing MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceComputationServerNotationDistributed computingTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmComputer networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driven by ever-increasing vehicular intelligent computation-intensive and delay-sensitive services, this paper investigates the computing offloading in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-assisted vehicular networks. Due to the limited onboard energy and computational resources of the mobile entities (i.e., the vehicles and the UAV), it is significant to explore the collaborative computation among the vehicles, the UAV, and the terrestrial computing servers for improving energy efficiency (EE) while trading off the service delay. Unlike existing work in the literature that is based on offline settings with a global view, an online distributed mechanism is proposed to cope with the spatial and temporal variations of the networks. Specifically, upon the arriving tasks and the real-time channel conditions, mobile entities adaptively decide about the task offloading and computational resources allocation in parallel. Moreover, the UAV also designs its trajectory with the residual battery capacity taken into account. Theoretical analysis shows that the developed approach can achieve the EE-delay tradeoff as <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$[ {O(1/V),O(V)} ]$</tex-math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$V$</tex-math></inline-formula> being a control parameter, and can strike a flexible balance between them by tuning <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$V$</tex-math></inline-formula> . Numerical results verify the theoretical analysis and reveal that the performance gain can be obtained over conventional methods in the EE performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.782

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it