MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312593557 · doi:10.1109/tase.2022.3217451

An Efficient Dynamic Auto-Regressive CCA for Time Series Imputation With Irregular Sampling

2022· article· en· W4312593557 on OpenAlex
Bo Xu, Qinqin Zhu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsData miningInterpretabilityWeightingComputer scienceImputation (statistics)Canonical correlationAutoregressive modelTime seriesMissing dataDynamic dataSoft sensorSampling (signal processing)Process (computing)Artificial intelligenceMachine learningEconometricsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

System dynamics are inevitable in industrial processes due to factors such as ambient disturbances and controller tuning. Accurate modeling of these dynamics are of key importance for subsequent process analysis and anomaly detection, and dynamic latent variable methods are widely adopted since they retain good interpretability. However, only dynamic cross-correlations are modeled in existing methods, leaving a large portion of quality information unexploited. In this work, an efficient dynamic auto-regressive canonical correlation analysis (EDACCA) method is proposed with a modified auto-regressive exogenous model to extract dynamics in both auto-correlations and cross-correlations. The flexibility and efficiency of EDACCA are improved with the design of weighting parameters and the economic singular value decomposition. EDACCA is further adapted for multi-step ahead (MS) prediction and missing data imputation. Two industrial processes are employed to evaluate the prediction performance and imputation performance of EDACCA.Note to Practitioners—Different sampling rates are usually set for process and quality variables in industrial processes, which leads to less quality samples. Meanwhile, system dynamics are not fully exploited for dynamic predictive modeling in most existing algorithms. The focus of this study is to develop a customized data imputation method for different data volume of process and quality data. An efficient dynamic auto-regressive canonical correlation analysis (EDACCA) is designed to extract temporal relations between process and quality variables, which is also adapted for multi-step-ahead prediction purpose. An EDACCA based data imputation method is also proposed to impute incomplete data caused by irregular sampling rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it