MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312595270 · doi:10.55951/nurture.v3i1.43

Young Adults’ Knowledge about Savings

2009· article· en· W4312595270 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie J. Lachance, Jacinthe Cloutier

Bibliographic record

VenueNURTURE · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersAutorité des Marchés Financiers
KeywordsFinancial independenceSample (material)Independence (probability theory)FinanceDemographic economicsPersonal incomePsychologyBusinessEconomic growthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sample of 966 young adults from the province of Quebec (Canada) participated in this study, which aimed to identify the determinants of knowledge about savings and investments and their relative importance. Our findings show that knowledge about savings and investments is rather low. Canadian-born males with high personal annual gross income and education are likely to have a higher level of knowledge in this area than their counterparts. Personal finance education, received outside of high school, attitude towards savings and having met with a personal finance professional, have a significant positive impact on this knowledge. The usefulness of financial education and the need to increase financial independence among young female adults are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNURTURESame topicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFrench-language works237,207