MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312595421 · doi:10.1109/tnse.2022.3211192

When Collaborative Federated Learning Meets Blockchain to Preserve Privacy in Healthcare

2022· article· en· W4312595421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNotationHealth careService providerArtificial intelligenceService (business)Machine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data-driven Machine and Deep Learning (ML/DL) is an emerging approach that uses medical data to build robust and accurate ML/DL models that can improve clinical decisions in some critical tasks ( <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$e.g.,$</tex-math></inline-formula> cancer diagnosis). However, ML/DL-based healthcare models still suffer from poor adoption due to the lack of realistic and recent medical data. The privacy nature of these medical datasets makes it difficult for clinicians and healthcare service providers, to share their sensitive data ( <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$i.e.,$</tex-math></inline-formula> Patient Health Records (PHR)). Thus, privacy-aware collaboration among clinicians and healthcare service providers is expected to become essential to build robust healthcare applications supported by next-generation networking (NGN) technologies, including Beyond sixth-generation (B6G) networks. In this paper, we design a new framework, called HealthFed, that leverages Federated Learning (FL) and blockchain technologies to enable privacy-preserving and distributed learning among multiple clinician collaborators. Specifically, HealthFed enables several distributed SDN-based domains, clinician collaborators, to securely collaborate in order to build robust healthcare ML-based models, while ensuring the privacy of each clinician participant. In addition, HealthFed ensures a secure aggregation of local model updates by leveraging a secure multiparty computation scheme ( <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$i.e.,$</tex-math></inline-formula> Secure Multiparty Computation (SMPC)). Furthermore, we design a novel blockchain-based scheme to facilitate/maintain the collaboration among clinician collaborators, in a fully decentralized, trustworthy, and flexible way. We conduct several experiments to evaluate HealthFed; in-depth experiments results using public Breast Cancer dataset show the efficiency of HealthFed, by not only ensuring the privacy of each collaborator's sensitive data, but also providing an accurate learning models, which makes HealthFed a promising framework for healthcare systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it