MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312603535 · doi:10.57027/eikasia.97.234

Bayle y Voltaire: la apuesta por la tolerancia

2021· article· es· W4312603535 on OpenAlex
Julian Arroyo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEikasía Revista de Filosofía · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSeventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Canadian institutionsService de Recherche et d'EXpertise en Transformation des Produits Forestiers
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bayle y Voltaire hacen una apuesta firme por la tolerancia en circunstancias vitales distintas. Uno, al refutar la interpretación de las palabras de Lucas por parte de san Agustín, que con-ducen a la justificación de la intolerancia para destruir la herejía. El otro, divulgando la conde-na de Calas al patíbulo por el fanatismo papista. Para Bayle hay que actuar en conciencia y libremente, aun en el caso de la conciencia errónea, que tiene, también, sus derechos, y no ir nunca contra la razón. Para Voltaire fanatismo y dogmatismo trastornan y violentan las socie-dades, convirtiéndolas en un infierno. Sólo la tolerancia es el bien social para la pluralidad de creencias. El propósito de este escrito es contrastar la concepción de la tolerancia de ambos autores, que en contextos distintos coinciden en lo básico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it