Communication interspécifique en Amazonie occidentale : la musique comme forme de conversation entre les plantes et les humains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chez les peuples autochtones d’Amazonie occidentale, où les cosmologies animistes constituent la norme, les relations entre les humains et les non-humains sont médiées par des formes de communication variées. Dans cet article, j’examine un type de musique chamanique propre aux communautés autochtones et métisses d’Amazonie occidentale appelé icaro. Partant d’exemples empruntés aux études ethnographiques, j’examine la manière dont ces chansons chamaniques sont acquises et utilisées pour communiquer avec des esprits et pour réaliser des changements dans le monde matériel. Puis, je convoque la phytosémiotique en conjonction avec les recherches récentes sur la communication chez les plantes pour montrer comment le processus de l’apprentissage chamanique et l’acquisition des icaros relèvent d’une communication interspécifique, au sens où l’apprenti intercepte et interprète les signaux phytochimiques inhérents au processus de communication des plantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".