MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312626945 · doi:10.4018/ijfsa.313428

Mehar Approach for Solving Shortest Path Problems With Interval-Valued Triangular Fuzzy Arc Weights

2022· article· en· W4312626945 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Fuzzy System Applications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMulti-Criteria Decision Making
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShortest path problemInterval (graph theory)Fuzzy logicMathematical optimizationPath (computing)MathematicsConstrained Shortest Path FirstK shortest path routingLongest path problemFuzzy numberArc (geometry)Computer scienceAlgorithmFuzzy setDiscrete mathematicsArtificial intelligenceCombinatoricsGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an alternative approach (named Mehar approach) is proposed for solving interval-valued triangular fuzzy shortest path problems. Also, it is shown that less computational efforts are required to apply the proposed Mehar approach as compared to Ebrahimnejad et al.'s method. Furthermore, to illustrate the proposed Mehar approach, the interval-valued triangular fuzzy shortest path problem, considered by Ebrahimnejad et al. to illustrate their proposed method, is solved by the proposed Mehar approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it