MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Augmented Visual Localization Using a Monocular Camera for Autonomous Mobile Robots

2022· article· en· W4312640123 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE 18th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceSimultaneous localization and mappingRobotMobile robotVisibilityPoint cloudMonocular

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A visual localization method utilizing a fisheye monocular camera is proposed to enhance navigation accuracy of autonomous mobile robots in indoor environments for warehouse or service robotics applications. Existing visual infrastructure-aided localization algorithms take advantage of uniquely colored or lit robots that limit their application to ideal lighting conditions, occlusion-free scenarios or multi-modal fusion with stereo vision, LiDAR, and inertial sensors which inevitably increases their complexity. Using fisheye monocular vision imposes challenges such as depth estimation, frame warping, and low accuracy of the state estimation for far objects. The proposed augmented localization framework includes an uncertainty-aware state observer employing a motion model with a learning-based input estimator and point cloud clusters over a region of interest, to estimate the position of a robot while maintaining effective computational efficiency. Observability of the developed state estimator and asymptotic stability of the estimation error dynamics are also studied. Various tests including occlusion, low visibility for far objects, and noisy depth estimation (from the clustered region of interest), have been conducted in indoor settings to validate the method. The tests confirm robust performance of the augmented visual localization framework in presence of intermittent measurements due to environmental conditions or low reliability of vision-based depth estimation. Furthermore, a significant increase in accuracy and consistency of visual localization is shown without using additional stereo, inertial, or LiDAR measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it