MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312643721 · doi:10.4000/books.pufr.23655

La sardine en boîte. Une consommation identitaire ?

2013· book-chapter· fr· W4312643721 on OpenAlexaff
Pascal Aumasson

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires François-Rabelais eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsNational Museum of Fine Arts of Quebec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSardinePolitical scienceArtFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dès les origines, tout concourt à faire de la consommation des sardines en conserve une pratique d’avant-garde. Certes, la découverte initiale de la stérilisation par Nicolas Appert est empirique, ce qui n’en fait pas un progrès scientifique à proprement parler. Du reste, en 1810, l’ouvrage dans lequel il consigne ces développements en porte témoignage dans son titre même – Le livre de tous les ménages ou l’art de conserver pendant plusieurs années toutes les substances animales et végétales...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires François-Rabelais eBooksSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207