MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

BERT-Enhanced with Context-Aware Embedding for Instance Segmentation in 3D Point Clouds

2022· article· en· W4312649849 on OpenAlexaff
Hongxin Yang, Hailun Yan, Ruisheng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIGARSS 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftmax functionComputer sciencePoint cloudSegmentationArtificial intelligenceEmbeddingCluster analysisPattern recognition (psychology)EncoderDeep learningComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspired by the successful implementation of transformer network in the Natural Language Processing (NLP), we propose a novel Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-based point cloud segmentation method. Specifically, the whole point cloud is scanned by multiple overlapping windows. We made the first attempt ever to input each window-point-cloud into the BERT model which outputs points' semantic labels and high-dimensional context-aware point embeddings. In the process of training, the Kullback-Leibler (KL)-Divergence-based clustering loss is utilized to optimize the network's parameters by calculating similarity matrices between the point embeddings and the predicted semantic labels. The final instance labels can be obtained by softmax function on these optimized point embeddings. By evaluating on the Stanford 3D Indoor Scene (S3DIS) dataset, our proposed method has reached a micro-mean accuracy (mAcc) of 87.3% on the semantic segmentation task and an Average Precision (mAP) on the instance segmentation task. The results on both tasks have surpassed the traditional point cloud segmentation models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIGARSS 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing SymposiumSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207