MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312655164 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2022.3227802

A Low-Offset VCO-Based Time-Domain Comparator Using a Phase Frequency Detector With Reduced Dead and Blind Zones

2022· article· en· W4312655164 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahin Esmaeilzadeh, Yves Audet, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsComparatorVoltage-controlled oscillatorCMOSDetectorOffset (computer science)Phase noiseMathematicsAlgorithmLinearityElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringComputer scienceVoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present in this paper a high-precision voltage-controlled oscillators (VCO)-based time-domain (TD) comparator. It involves two identical and linear VCOs to convert the input voltage difference of the comparator into the time/frequency difference. Also, it includes a novel low-power phase frequency detector (PFD) to compare the output frequencies of the VCOs. The proposed PFD technique reduces the problematic effects of missing edges and phase ambiguity in conventional circuits by minimizing dead-zone (DZ)/blind-zone (BZ) and suppressing unwanted output glitches. The TD-comparator prototype is fabricated in a 350 -nm CMOS process having an active area of 0.01 mm2. The comparator consumes 93.65 μ W power from a 3.3 -V supply and provides a conversion rate of 2.7 MHz with 148 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\boldsymbol {\mu }\mathbf {V_{rms}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> input-referred noise. Measurement results of 5 fabricated chips show an input-referred offset standard deviation of 81.14 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mu }\text{V}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> . Stand-alone characteristics measurements of the proposed PFD show a minimized DZ and BZ of less than 12 and 22.7 ps, respectively. With an almost <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\pm 2\pi }$ </tex-math></inline-formula> input phase range, the maximum operating frequency of the PFD is 1.32 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207