El respeto a la libertad religiosa de los contrayentes y la obligatoriedad de la celebración civil del matrimonio previa a la religiosa. Discusión doctrinal y propuestas "de lege ferenda" en el Derecho comparado centroeuropeo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La discusión que se planteó en Centroeuropa acerca de la conveniencia de mantener la obligatoriedad del 'primado' del matrimonio civil, ofrece nuevas reflexiones sobre la relación entre la forma del matrimonio y sus elementos estructurales básicos, como la heterosexualidad. Del estudio de las leyes de matrimonio civil de Austria se concluye que para el respeto de las formas religiosas de celebración del matrimonio parece mejor la fundamentación en la libertad religiosa de los contrayentes que en la vertiente institucional. La doctrina de Lutero considera el matrimonio una cuestión civil, por ello los fieles evangélicos aceptan el régimen matrimonial establecido por la autoridad secular, si se respetan los elementos del matrimonio natural. El Derecho civil alemán no ha llamado a las uniones homosexuales matrimonio. Si la normativa civil del matrimonio se aparta de los elementos comunes con el matrimonio natural, los ciudadanos evangélico-luteranos se verán obligados a influir más eficazmente en el régimen del matrimonio civil o a impulsar el cambio hacia un sistema de matrimonio electivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".