Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adopting the classical Vitruvian definition of the ARCHITECTURE as unity of the Form-Function-Structure trinity, on cosmic level results the extended definition of the COSMIC ARCHITECTURE as quaternionic resultant of the three-interactional systemic components Dynamic/Cyclic Form- Evolution Function-Dual Structure. Starting from the WHOLE PERIODIC SYSTEM with 558 chemical elements, Gluon and Quark pre-elements, and the start/transitional IOVITZU’S ETHERON, and extending it with the 9th BIONIC/ETHERONIC axis perpendicular to the well-known 8 axes/16 semiaxes, resulted a GENERALIZATION of this EXTENDED WHOLE PERIODIC SYSTEM within a fractal-like structured octavic system. The Dynamic Duality of the Evolution being present everywhere at all times, on micro- and macro-cosmic levels alike, in form of nucleonicand bionicstructures based on the sphere-torus reciprocal dual relations, we can distinguish nucleonic and bionic atomic structures, respectively nucleonic structured/octavic/light and bionic stuctured/pentatonic/dark cosmic evolutionary phases, with meaningful consequences of this new world concept/view of life. The DUALITY implying the SPLITTING possibility, the ancient Greek „a-tom”=unsplittable is followed by its successive discovered components proton-neutron-quark-gluon-ETHERON-BION, and on higher cosmic levels the Lightness/Darkness (determined by the etheronic-bionic balance within the spheric-toroidal structures), Life, Chaos, Gravitation. Every dual system or cosmic formation is splittable, it is „only” an energetic barriers question! The other-quaternionic- structural principle leads us to the Menora-like gradual structural diversity of the GRAVITATION, in correlation with the above mentioned energetic barriers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".