MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312663132 · doi:10.1049/icp.2022.2020

Iterative feedback design of de Laval nozzle

2022· article· en· W4312663132 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shi Liu, Wenxin Li, Wenqi Zhang, Hairun Wen, Shangliang Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueIET conference proceedings. · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRocket and propulsion systems research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleIsentropic processIterative and incremental developmentPropulsionParametric designAerospace engineeringProcess (computing)Iterative designMechanical engineeringAerodynamicsComputer scienceParametric statisticsEngineering design processSimulationEngineeringPhysicsMechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cold gas propulsion through de Laval nozzles is a convenient way to enable position and attitude manoeuvres of groundbased satellite simulators. A parametric model of a de Laval nozzle is established base on the theory of one-dimensional isentropic flow, and the methodology of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) is adopted to guide the iterative feedback design process. In the process of design, the effect of design factors on the nozzle performance are evaluated, such as nozzle shape, length of convergent and divergent section, inlet and outlet diameters, and throat diameter. Simulation and experimental results demonstrate the improvement of the nozzle performance through iterative feedback design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET conference proceedings.Same topicRocket and propulsion systems researchFrench-language works237,207