Gladiolus Hybrids for Commercial Traits and their Evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present experiments were conducted with twenty-eight gladiolus hybrids along with check at the research farm of the Division of Floriculture & Landscaping, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi during the year 2021-22 to study the gladiolus hybrids for commercial traits and their performance and suitability for commercialization and profitability. The mean performance of gladiolus hybrids data were highly significant for all the traits studied. The results indicated that early flowering was observed in hybrids such as Chandni x Snow Princess, P-16-1 x Eurovision, Melody Open Seedlings and High Hopes Open Seedlings and its range was from 76.00 – 88.33 days after planting, whereas, late flowering was observed in hybrids such as Rose Time Steam Boat x GreenWillow (114.66 day), Swarnima x Viola (111.00 day) and Candyman x Anjali (107.00 day) respectively. Maximum plant height 145.33 cm, 133.00 cm, 131.33 cm, 131.00 cm and 130.66 cm were recorded in Green Pasture x Regency, Smokey Lady x HeadyWine, Salmon Queen Open Seedlings, Canada x GreenWillow and American Beauty x GreenWillow respectively. Number of florets per spike more than 19 was received in hybrid AVE x Mayur, Vidushi Mutant, Mayur x Howard, Pearl Beauty x Lucky Shamrock, Mayur x GreenWillow and Green Lilac Open Seedlings respectively. Maximum number of corms per plant was seen in many hybrids such as Smokey Lady x Oscar, Chandni x Snow Princess, Vidushi Mutant, Canada x GreenWillow, Candyman x Anjali, Salmon Queen Open Seedlings and Melody Open Seedlings respectively as compare to remaining hybrids and check. Hybrids Smokey Lady x HeadyWine, Vidushi Mutant and Canada x GreenWillow had produced maximum number of cormels as 77.33, 74.66, and 72.00 respectively as compare to other hybrids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".