MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312668443 · doi:10.23952/jnva.6.2022.5.08

Optimal feedback control for a class of second-order evolution differential inclusions with Clarke’s subdifferential

2022· article· en· W4312668443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nonlinear and Variational Analysis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEuropean Commission
KeywordsDifferential inclusionSubderivativeClass (philosophy)Order (exchange)MathematicsDifferential (mechanical device)Applied mathematicsControl (management)Mathematical economicsControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationComputer sciencePhilosophyEconomicsEpistemologyPhysicsRegular polygonArtificial intelligenceGeometryThermodynamicsConvex optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this paper is to study optimal feedback control for a class of non-autonomous second-order evolution inclusions with Clarke's subdifferential in a separable reflexive Banach space. We only assume that the second order evolution operator involved satisfies the strong continuity condition instead of the compactness, which was used in previous literature. By using the properties of multimaps and Clarke's subdifferential, we assume some sufficient conditions to ensure the existence of feasible pairs of the feedback control systems. Furthermore, we also prove the existence of optimal control pairs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it