MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312675564 · doi:10.26034/lu.akwi.2019.3234

Edelmetallcontrolling in einer Halbleiterfabrik

2019· article· de· W4312675564 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnwendungen und Konzepte der Wirtschaftsinformatik · 2019
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Management
Canadian institutionsInfineon Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beim Edelmetallcontrolling von Infineon sind Fehler nur mit hohem Aufwand analysierbar und es bewirkt widersprechende Berechnungshinweise. Alle vier Perspektiven des Edelmetallcontrollings werden verbessert und als einzige Datenquelle wird die von SAP festgesetzt. Weitere Verbesserungen werden durch die Umwandlung einer monatlichen Kursänderungserhebung in eine jährliche, durch die Verwendung des Marktwerts für den Bestandswert sowie durch Ermittlung eines Normwerts für eine jährliche Recyclingquote erzielt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.008
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it