MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312678748 · doi:10.4000/gc.17755

La montagne alpine

2020· article· fr· W4312678748 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Léa Sallenave

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie et cultures · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les notions de racialisation et de blanchité pour analyser les espaces récréatifs en montagne ont été peu utilisées en France. Cet article confronte les représentations véhiculées par un corpus d’images promotionnelles, valorisant les corps blancs en station de sports d’hiver entre 2018 et 2020, et d’images fiction­nelles, mettant en scène des protagonistes noirs et métis en montagne. Les sites Internet des stations des Alpes vantent clairement la blancheur de la clientèle de leurs espaces et relèguent les populations non blanches au sein d’espaces périphé­riques, voire les invisibilisent. Paradoxalement, les comédies grand public, mettant en scène des personnages noirs et métis pratiquant des activités alpines, contri­buent à renforcer la montagne comme « espace blanc ». La montagne y est ainsi lue comme un espace de manifestation de la blanchité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie et culturesSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207