MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312682473 · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20210215

Antibiotic susceptibility of urine culture specimens in Ontario: a population-based cohort study

2022· article· en· W4312682473 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Alex Marchand‐Austin, Samantha Lee, Bradley J. Langford, Nick Daneman, Derek R. MacFadden, Christina Diong, Kevin L. Schwartz, Vanessa Allen, Jennie Johnstone, Samir N. Patel, Gary Garber, Kevin A. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueCMAJ Open · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioHealth Sciences CentreHotel Dieu Shaver Health and Rehabilitation CentreOttawa HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OttawaSinai Health SystemSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNitrofurantoinCiprofloxacinAntibioticsMedicineUrineCefazolinAmpicillinPopulationSulfamethoxazoleCohortTrimethoprimInternal medicineMicrobiologyBiologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background:</h3> Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance is essential to mitigate its impact on population health and inform local empiric treatment practices. Our aims were to evaluate urine culture specimen susceptibility from a range of diverse settings and describe antibiotic susceptibility across all organisms and compare susceptibilities to that of <i>Escherichia coli</i> alone. <h3>Methods:</h3> In this descriptive cohort study, we measured the prevalence of organisms in urine culture specimens using linked province-wide administrative databases. Using positive urine cultures collected in Ontario between Jan. 1, 2016, and Dec. 31, 2017, we measured susceptibility to 6 classes of antibiotics using a weighted antibiogram for all organisms compared with <i>E. coli</i> alone. <h3>Results:</h3> We included 689 497 cultures derived from 569 399 patients and 879 778 test orders for specimens. For all organisms, the rates of susceptibility in the outpatient, inpatient and long-term care settings were 49.3%, 42.8% and 39.2%, respectively, for ampicillin; 83.1%, 72.7% and 69.7%, respectively, for nitrofurantoin; 80.3%, 64.8% and 73.1%, respectively, for trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole; 87.2%, 74.1% and 66.2%, respectively, for ciprofloxacin; 90.6%, 73.6% and 85.1%, respectively, for aminoglycosides; and 82.6%, 57.5% and 73.5%, respectively, for cefazolin. We found resistance to 3 or more antibiotic classes in 20.6% of episodes for all organisms compared with 14.0% for <i>E. coli</i> alone. The average absolute difference in antibiotic susceptibility between all organisms and <i>E. coli</i> across all drugs was lowest in the outpatient setting (6.2%) and highest in the inpatient setting (14.6%). <h3>Interpretation:</h3> In this study, urinary organism prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility varied across health care settings and patient populations, with implications for both antimicrobial resistance surveillance and clinical decision-making. Weighted antibiograms may be most useful for guiding empiric treatment of urinary infections in inpatient settings where the diversity of infectious organisms is higher than in the community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMAJ OpenSame topicUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFrench-language works237,207