MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312683908 · doi:10.7202/1093776ar

To begin, over again. Dix-huit accès à <i>The Photographer</i> de David Tomas ou comment orner un cadavre de façon opportune1 ?

2022· article· fr· W4312683908 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sophie Clément

Bibliographic record

VenueIntermédialités Histoire et théorie des arts des lettres et des techniques · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPerformative utteranceExposition (narrative)Art historyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article se veut une lecture attentive de l’installation The Photographer de David Tomas (1950–2019) telle que présentée lors de l’exposition Aurora Borealis (Montréal, 1985) ainsi que son itération subséquente dans la revue SubStance (1986). À partir de documentation photographique, de documents d’archives, d’entretiens et d’une revue sélective de la littérature, le texte pose — de façon performative — la question du retour sur l’oeuvre par l’écriture dans un contexte posthume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0090.010
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntermédialités Histoire et théorie des arts des lettres et des techniquesSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207