MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312688772 · doi:10.1109/pn56061.2022.9908255

Terahertz metasurface based on additive manufacturing technology

2022· article· en· W4312688772 on OpenAlexaff
Redwan Ahmad, Mariia Zhuldybina, X. Ropagnol, F. Blanchard

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 Photonics North (PN) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerahertz radiationElectronicsTerahertz metamaterialsMaterials scienceBand-pass filter3D printingOptoelectronicsTerahertz spectroscopy and technologyTransmission (telecommunications)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringOpticsElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We compare and analyze terahertz (THz) metasurfaces fabricated using two distinct additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, i.e., printable electronics (PE) and three-dimensional (3D) printing. With terahertz time domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS), the performance of these devices was investigated. Both samples’ transmission characteristics were consistent with simulation results, demonstrating the effectiveness of the manufacturing technique and that they can be widely used for bandpass filtering applications at a low cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 Photonics North (PN)Same topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207