PERCEPTION OF SELF-GROWTH DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY WITH OLDER ADULTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pandemia de Covid-19 apareceu de forma global, afetando assim o auto-crescimento da populao idosa. O objetivo deste estudo consiste na identificao e anlise no auto-crescimento dos indivduos idosos de duas nacionalidades: mexicana e portuguesa. Neste estudo participaram 226 idosos, com 65 anos ou mais anos e residentes na comunidade. Foi executada um estudo qualitativo transcultural, atravs de um protocolo de entrevista semiestruturada. Os participantes foram interrogados sobre a sua perceo do seu auto-crescimento durante a pandemia. Posteriormente foi feita uma anlise de contedo e foram identificados os temas centrais. A anlise de contedos indicou os seguintes temas: (1) Partilha de experincias de vida; (2) Relao afetiva de qualidade; (3) Espiritualidade e religio; (4) Estar ativo; (5) Interesse por novos projetos; e (6) Participao cvica. Os participantes idosos com nacionalidade mexicana relataram que a partilha de experincias de vida como o tema mais relevante, enquanto para os participantes portugueses, possuir uma relao afetiva de qualidade era mais importante. Este estudo evidenciou a heterogeneidade de experincias vivenciadas por cada cultura, realando o auto-crescimento dos idosos no perodo pandmico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".