MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single-lead ECG Compression for Connected Healthcare Applications

2022· article· en· W4312722470 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelrahman Abdou, Sridhar Krishnan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWearable computerLossless compressionOperabilityReal-time computingWaveformData compressionCompression ratioEmbedded systemComputer hardwareArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preventive healthcare is achievable through physiological long-term remote monitoring. In connected healthcare, wearables that can collect physiological signals such as electrocardiograms (ECG) and electroencephalogram (EEG) can help improve health outcomes in society. For single-lead ECG devices, there are still limitations for this role that includes short time continuous operability and uncomfortable sensors worn by the user making it non-appealing for uninterrupted remote monitoring. However, with the current advances in microelectronics, embedded systems, sensors, and Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), long-term monitoring is realizable. A decrease to the overall power consumption of the wearable leads to an increase in device longevity while dry ECG electrodes can be used to increase user comfort. This work proposes a lossless LempelZiv Welch (LZW) compression algorithm used to compress and optimize the raw ECG data obtained from a 3D printed dry electrode based single-lead ECG device. This approach utilizes the ECG's inherent waveform characteristics. The single-lead ECG's R-peak and RR-intervals are used as one-bit information that are further compressed for shorter wireless transmission, leading to an increase in battery life and device operation. The algorithm showed a high compression ratio (CR) for 10 seconds, 30 seconds, 1-minute and 5-minute ECG signals where CR was 0.99, 0.91, 0.91, 0.92, respectively. For the 5-minute ECG signal, the size of data decreased from 225 Kbytes to 18.75 Kbytes while retaining R-peak and RR interval information for heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) calculations. This work adds to the current progress in single-lead ECG in long-term continuous remote monitoring for connected healthcare applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207