Piecemeal Clustering: a Self-Driven Data Clustering Algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Various approaches have been discussed in the literature for the clustering of data, such as partitioning, hierarchical, and machine learning methods. Most of the approaches require some prior knowledge about the clusters, such as their total number. Furthermore, some previous algorithms are not robust enough to process higher-dimensional data or require a large amount of memory for computations. We propose, herein, a data clustering algorithm, Piecemeal Clustering, that successfully clusters data without prior knowledge of the number of clusters. The proposed clustering algorithm uses the similarity and density of the data to identify the number of clusters in the data set and works with both low- and high-dimensional data. We demonstrate the power of the proposed Piecemeal Clustering algorithm with two real-world data sets. It is found that the proposed algorithm outperforms seven other state-of-the-art algorithms on both of these data sets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.014 | 0.026 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it