MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312727668 · doi:10.12795/hid.2022.i49.15

Fidelidad y servicio. La Corte de Juan II de Aragón como plataforma de ascenso social y movilidad entre reinos / Loyalty and service. The Court of John II of Aragon as a platform for social ascent and mobility between kingdoms.

2022· article· es· W4312727668 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Irene Velasco Marta

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoria Instituciones Documentos · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Iberia
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad de ZaragozaEgg Farmers of Canada
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

: La llegada de los Trastámara al trono aragonés favoreció la movilidad geográfica de un importante sector de las élites castellanas que pronto se instaló en sus nuevos territorios patrimoniales. El presente artículo analiza las transformaciones derivadas de esta migración de élites durante el reinado de Juan II (1458-1479), en el que cristalizaron las dinámicas iniciadas previamente por su padre, Fernando I. Mediante la consulta de registros de cancillería y documentación notarial y municipal, se ha realizado el análisis prosopográfico de algunos de los linajes e individuos castellanos al servicio del tercer Trastámara aragonés para comprobar su nivel de integración entre las élites locales. Con este propósito abordamos, en primer lugar, el proceso de articulación de su entorno curial, primero como infante y posteriormente como rey de Aragón, para profundizar a continuación en el proceso de instalación de esta nueva élite castellana en el reino de Aragón y, especialmente, en su capital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoria Instituciones DocumentosSame topicMedieval and Early Modern IberiaFrench-language works237,207