MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Induction Machine Emulation for Extreme Weather Conditions

2022· article· en· W4312729682 on OpenAlexafffund
Gayatri Tanuku, Pragasen Pillay

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEmulationRobustness (evolution)VoltageComputer scienceElectric power systemHardware-in-the-loop simulationEngineeringControl engineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power hardware in loop technology can be used to emulate a machine's electrical behavior. This is done by power converter in a real time control loop. Stochastic extreme weather conditions lead to power systems faults. Under such conditions, the industrial machines should be able to disconnect and reconnect to the grid to have continued operations. The optimal reclosing operations to avoid vulnerability requires the knowledge of the machine terminal voltage in prior. Conventional voltage in and current out induction machine models will not provide such information. Hence, a current in voltage out model of the industrial induction machine is developed and tested with the proposed machine emulator for different fault opening and reclosing operations. High performance linear amplifiers of 100 kHz bandwidth are used for better emulating capability. The emulator test results for different reclosing operations are validated with a real machine to prove the robustness of the proposed PHIL emulator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207