CROMOSim: A Deep Learning-Based Cross-Modality Inertial Measurement Simulator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the prevalence of wearable devices, inertial measurement unit (IMU) data has been utilized in monitoring and assessing human mobility such as human activity recognition (HAR) and human pose estimation (HPE). Training deep neural network (DNN) models for these tasks require a large amount of labelled data, which are hard to acquire in uncontrolled environments. To mitigate the data scarcity problem, we design CROMOSim, a cross-modality sensor simulator that simulates high fidelity virtual IMU sensor data from motion capture systems or monocular RGB cameras. It utilizes a skinned multi-person linear model (SMPL) for 3D body pose and shape representations to enable simulation from arbitrary on-body positions. Then a DNN model is trained to learn the functional mapping from imperfect trajectory estimations in a 3D SMPL body tri-mesh due to measurement noise, calibration errors, occlusion and other modelling artifacts, to IMU data. We evaluate the fidelity of CROMOSim simulated data and its utility in data augmentation on various HAR and HPE datasets. Extensive empirical results show that the proposed model achieves a 6.7% improvement over baseline methods in a HAR task.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".