MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tackling Italian University Assessment Tests with Transformer-Based Language Models

2022· book-chapter· en· W4312738848 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniele Puccinelli, Silvia Demartini, Pier Luigi Ferrari

Bibliographic record

VenueAccademia University Press eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNatural Language Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsTransformerComputer scienceSecurity tokenNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceTask (project management)Cloze testTest (biology)Mathematics educationReading (process)Reading comprehensionLinguisticsPsychologyEngineeringComputer securitySystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloze tests are a great tool to asses reading proficiency as well as analytical thinking, and are therefore employed in admission and assessment tests at various levels of the education system in multiple countries. In Italy, cloze tests are administered to incoming university students to ascertain their starting level. The goal of a cloze test is to determine several tokens that have been pre-deleted from a text; this is largely equivalent to the well-known NLP task of missing token prediction. In this paper, we show that cloze tests can be solved reasonably well with various Transformer-based pre-trained language models, whose performance often compares favorably to the one of incoming Italian university students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccademia University Press eBooksSame topicNatural Language Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207