MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Une illustration du pouvoir : les chartes ornées médiévales

2013· book-chapter· fr· W4312751605 on OpenAlexaff
Ghislain Brunel

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Justice
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comme chacun peut s’en rendre compte, les expositions de manuscrits enluminés se succèdent partout en Europe à un rythme soutenu ; elles répondent aux exigences du public contemporain, avide de se rapprocher de la mentalité et de l’imaginaire des hommes du Moyen Âge. L’histoire de ces manuscrits est plus que séculaire, appuyée sur une longue tradition savante, et elle se fonde sur les milliers d’exemplaires conservés dans les bibliothèques. Les chartes ornées, quant à elles, se démarquent de ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooksSame topicMedieval and Early Modern JusticeFrench-language works237,207