MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312761308 · doi:10.1115/pvp2022-80855

The Follow Up Development and on the Usage of the Profiled Wire Gasket

2022· article· en· W4312761308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2: Computer Technology and Bolted Joints; Design and Analysis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Structural Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsPositive Living North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGasketFlangeEngineeringMechanical engineeringForensic engineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The paper discusses the development of sealing technology within the organization with particular emphasis on the gasket manufactured by profiled winding wire. This will be referred to as a PWG. The paper is a continuation of the paper presented in Paris PVP2013-97050 and follow up papers in PVP2014-28948 and in PVP2018-84067. It discusses further laboratory testing and briefly describes two related field service case studies. The paper details tests which include: oxidation testing of graphite, compression and recovery testing, chemical resistance testing of fillers in Sulphuric Acid service. The two related studies are based around the use in a Western Canadian refinery on a hot vapour exchanger and on a Fluidised Catalytic Cracker problematic flange.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it