MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cptnn: Cross-Parallel Transformer Neural Network For Time-Domain Speech Enhancement

2022· article· en· W4312785109 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Wang, Bengbeng He, Wei‐Ping Zhu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransformerEncoderSpeech recognitionArtificial neural networkSpeech enhancementPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceVoltageEngineeringNoise reductionElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel cross-parallel transformer neural network (CPTNN) for end-to-end speech enhancement in the time domain. The new structure is comprised of an encoder, a cross-parallel transformer module (CPTM), a masking module and a decoder. The encoder first maps the input waveform of noisy speech into feature representations. The CPTM consists of four residually connected cross-parallel transformer blocks, each utilizing local and global transformers to simultaneously extract local and global features which are then fused by a cross-attention based transformer to obtain a better contextual feature representation. The masking module generates a mask to multiply with encoder output, producing the masked encoder features which will be finally used for reconstructing the enhanced speech by the decoder. Experiments are undertaken on the benchmark dataset, indicating that our CPTNN achieves a better performance than state-of-the-art methods in terms of most evaluation criteria while maintaining the lowest model parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207