MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312790414 · doi:10.31314/zijk.v8i2.1109

PERBEDAAN PERTUMBUHAN BAYI YANG DIBERIKAN ASI EKSKLUSIF DAN YANG DIBERIKAN SUSU FORMULA DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS DUNGINGI KOTA GORONTALO

2021· article· en· W4312790414 on OpenAlexaff
Harismayanti Harismayanti, Ani Retni

Bibliographic record

VenueZaitun (Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingObservational studyMedicineMathematicsAnimal scienceStatisticsPediatricsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research was conducted at Dungingi health centre work area. The objective was to determine the difference of infant’s growth that given exclusive breastfeeding and formula milk at Dungingi health centre. The design used analytic observational with cross sectional approach. The samples in this research are 34 samples. This research used statiscal test of independent T test. The result obtained there is no significance differences between infant’s body weight that given exclusive breastfeeding with formula milk with p value 0,240 (>α 0,05). Theres is no significance differences of infant’s tall that given exclusive breastfeeding with formula milk withp value 0,105 (>α 0,05). Thus Ho is rejected. The conclusion of the research was there is no differences of infat’s growth that given exclusive breastfeeding with formula milk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZaitun (Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan)Same topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207