MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312791397 · doi:10.1039/9781839167829-00080

Gasification of Biomass: An Overview

2022· book-chapter· en· W4312791397 on OpenAlexaff
Garima Chauhan, Natalia Montoya Sánchez, Cibele Melo Halmenschlager, Felix Link

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyngasBiomass gasificationBiomass (ecology)Coal gasificationRaw materialWood gas generatorProcess engineeringWaste managementEnvironmental scienceRenewable energyCoalFischer–Tropsch processProcess (computing)EngineeringBiofuelChemistryComputer scienceCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gasification of biomass for the production of renewable energy and chemicals has gained increasing attention in recent years. Although gasification is a mature technology for the conversion of coal, modifying the existing technology, as well as understanding the implications of the significant variation of biomass composition in the overall gasification process, is still a challenge. This chapter focuses on the process of biomass gasification to produce syngas, which can then be utilized in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Selection of feedstock, pretreatment, and the reaction chemistry of gasification are discussed to provide the basics of the gasification process. Details are provided of the practical applications of gasification, the reactor configuration used for gasification and the effect of various gasification parameters on the quality of syngas produced. This chapter also briefly covers current developments in the field of biomass gasification and possible operational challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesFrench-language works237,207